I have two links for you and they are sure to fit any mood. If you want to laugh, I would suggest looking at Jon Stewart’s ‘touching’ farewell to Lou Dobbs. If you want to think, the debate between the Democratic candidates for the open Senate seat in Massachusetts is for you. (Just ignore where Mr. Pagliuca says he is in favor of a draft…he changed his mind about an hour later)
Enjoy and happy almost weekend!
Ok, so I was going to post this video of perhaps one of the greatest Daily Show segments ever. However, then I found this video about Prop. 8 (the anti-gay marriage bill in CA.) It is often the case that humor helps to crystalize an argument and make the holes in one side seem painfully obvious. When you bring together the incredible talents of Marc Shaiman, John C. Reilly, Jack Black and many more (including a great one about haf way through), you get an absolutly brilliant video. Look, I don’t care if you don’t click any of my links…WATCH THIS VIDEO. PLEASE! I’m sure we will talk more about this issue in the future but, for now, just watch.
For today’s link of the day, I have two videos from the fabulous Jon Stewart and the team at the Daily Show.
The first video is Mr. Stewart reflecting on the priorities of our 24 hour news networks, specifically CNN. The great thing about the Daily Show is that, in their mocking, they bring up really important points and deliver their message in an entertaining manner. Stewart is right that these news networks have a responsibility to call their guests out when they exaggerate or make things up. If they were really good about doing that, then maybe people could have the confidence that what they are hearing is accurate and valid debates could be more prevalent. We would all be better off as a result. When you think about…oh….what’s that? Ok, I’d like to tell you more, but I’m going to have to leave it there 🙂
The second video is more on the story regarding 30 republicans who voted against an Al Franken amendment that would prohibit the government from doing business with companies who have clauses in employment contracts making it impossible for rape victims to sue. As is to be expected, Jon Stewart has an opinion on this. I think I am more sad than anything else that this is where our senate is right now. Despite what some of the opposing 30 would have you believe, the government has the right to choose who they do business with and the responsibility to set an example for workplace standards. In fact, to quote Chief Justice Rehnquist “‘Congress may attach conditions on the receipt of federal funds and has repeatedly employed that power to further broad policy objectives.” Setting as a condition of a receiving a contract that the corporation allows rape victims to have their day in court is not a political attack. It is the logical and morally correct thing to do.
I won’t go as far as those who are saying that a vote against this amendment is a vote in support of rapists, but I will say that, at best, the priorities of these 30 senators are horribly misplaced. From some of these Senators I would have expected a vote like this (Chambliss, Vitter) but, from some, I am really surprised and saddened (Lindsay Graham, John McCain). I applaud the other 68 Senators (including 10 republicans) who supported this amendment, want to hear why Senator Spector chose to sit this one out (I can forgive Senator Byrd since he is still battling major health issues), and hope at least some of the 30 who voted no will come to understand how wrong they are and re-think their priorities. Failing that, I hope they lose their next election.